Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: New horology failure

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New horology failure
Date: 2004-05-24 16:02:44
Message-ID: a174b01d22nhjb04qi22mth8cep834k6na@email.aon.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
[resending...]


On Sun, 23 May 2004 11:38:51 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne
<chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>I get this since Tom's commit.

>--- ./results/horology.out      Sun May 23 11:39:49 2004
>***************
>*** 1787,1796 ****
>!      | Sat Sep 22 18:19:20 2001 PDT | @ 34 years                    | Fri Sep 22 18:19:20 1967 PDT
>[...]
>--- 1787,1796 ----
>!      | Sat Sep 22 18:19:20 2001 PDT | @ 34 years                    | Fri Sep 22 18:19:20 1967 PST
>[...]

I got the same with snapshot-20040521 yesterday [i.e. 2004-05-22]
afternoon when I ran make check.  But only once.  make installcheck
passed all tests, and the failure didn't reappear when I tried make
check again.

I just got the failure again with make check after having configured
with a new install directory.  My guess is that horology needs some
datafile from the install location.

Servus
 Manfred

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ismail KizirDate: 2004-05-24 16:38:58
Subject: Optimizer bug??
Previous:From: Manfred KoizarDate: 2004-05-24 16:00:36
Subject: Re: zero-column table behavior

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group