-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 19-Oct-2001 Barry Lind wrote:
> Did you send this just to me or the entire list. It appears that you
> sent it just to me. I think the good points you make here should be
> seen by everyone. Can you send it to the pgsql-jdbc list?
Whoops. Yeah, I just now resent it to the group. Thanks for catching that.
> Specifically, if we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my
> objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) goes
> away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other
> reasons you mention.
Works for me. As I mentioned in my last email, I'm easy about this one. As
long as I can build it in Linux/UNIX, I'm happy. Its an added benefit to
the postgresql community that it can be built on Windows and Mac.
Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-10-19 23:19:55|
|Subject: Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration|
|Previous:||From: Ned Wolpert||Date: 2001-10-19 18:50:24|
|Subject: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration|