Re: jdbc large object support ??

From: Joachim Achtzehnter <joachim(at)kraut(dot)bc(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: jdbc large object support ??
Date: 2000-07-19 20:57:11
Message-ID: Pine.WNT.4.21.0007191355090.148-100000@van4
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, John Thorhauer wrote:
>
> Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
> >
> > Take a look at the mailing list archive. This question was discussed in
> > great detail during the last couple of days. You use setBytes() and
> > getBytes() instead of streams, for details see the archive.
> >
>
> OK. I looked at that and I saw someone mention something about using
> the text type to store data. What I am doing is trying to store xml
> files in postgres.

Was not referring to the use of the text type, but rather to the lengthy
discussion about how one can use Postgresql large objects via JDBC. Just
read all of yesterday's messages with "setBytes" or "Blob" in the subject
line. This was all about large object (BLOB) support.

Joachim

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Shraibman 2000-07-19 22:10:31 Cursors and JDBC
Previous Message John Thorhauer 2000-07-19 20:41:50 Re: jdbc large object support ??