Re: pg_restore new option -m

hi Tom,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Tom Lane wrote:

> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:41:34 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore new option -m
>
> ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr writes:
>> pg_restore -C -m 4 -d template1 db.dmp
>> gives numerous errors, mostly no such relation at index creation time.
>
> You sure you don't get exactly the same without -m?
>
yes!
> regards, tom lane
>
the pg.gz script shows the output of :
pg_restore -C -m
pg_restore -C
dropdb;createdb; pg_restore -m

regards,
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)