Re: Unixware 714 pthreads

From: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unixware 714 pthreads
Date: 2004-10-28 17:47:38
Message-ID: Pine.UW2.4.53.0410281945240.5892@server.pyrenet.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:11:12 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unixware 714 pthreads
>
> ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr writes:
> > if i do it a second time in the same session, blockme() never returns
>
> > I wonder if handle_sig_alarm is re-armed after being used
>
> No. Why should the signal handler need re-arming?
My impression was that once caught, signal handler for a particular signal
is reset to SIG-DFL.
>
> > or if sleep is used anywhere in the backend.
>
> Nope.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Oh well, bye bye htreads on unixware, I give up! (very disapointed)

cheers
--
Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
6, Chemin d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE Email: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-28 17:55:56 Re: Unixware 714 pthreads
Previous Message Darcy Buskermolen 2004-10-28 17:35:04 Re: Beta 4 on Debian Sarge (MIPS/MIPSEL)