On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Olivier PRENANT <ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr> writes:
> > Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not
> > used.
> 
> That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything
> that even knows SSL exists.  Larry, can you confirm this behavior?
Hi, I've been testing a little more further and found that (with-openssl)
if initdb is done with LANG=C, int8 test succeeds
if initdb is done with LANG=fr int8 test fails.

I'll try nowwithout openssl and LANG=fr

Regards
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 

-- 
Olivier PRENANT         	Tel:	+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
Quartier d'Harraud Turrou           +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE                      +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE                      Email: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)

In response to

• Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken? at 2001-02-28 17:04:10 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-03-01 15:35:29
	Subject: Re: AW: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...
Previous:	From: Dave Page	Date: 2001-03-01 08:19:05
	Subject: RE: Re: [HACKERS] Release in 2 weeks ...

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:	From: De Azort	Date: 2001-03-01 12:10:15
	Subject: error from server
Previous:	From: Thomas Lockhart	Date: 2001-03-01 06:59:00
	Subject: Re: Wrong output for 7.0.3 from NULL fields in CASE statement