Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query

From: Oleg Broytmann <phd(at)sun(dot)med(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query
Date: 1999-02-24 15:36:05
Message-ID: Pine.SOL2.3.96.SK.990224183415.10537L-100000@sun.med.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
> What version are you running? Also, does it act the same if you try to

6.4.2 on Sparc-solaris2.5.1

> EXPLAIN that same query? If EXPLAIN fails then the problem is in the
> plan/optimize stage, not actual execution of the query.

EXPLAIN works fine:

EXPLAIN SELECT DISTINCT p.subsec_id
FROM central cn, shops sh, districts d, positions p
WHERE cn.shop_id = sh.shop_id AND sh.distr_id = d.distr_id
AND d.city_id = 2 AND cn.pos_id = p.pos_id
AND cn.date_i >= current_date - '7 days'::timespan
;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:

Unique (cost=0.00 size=0 width=0)
-> Sort (cost=0.00 size=0 width=0)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00 size=1 width=16)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00 size=1 width=12)
-> Merge Join (cost=0.00 size=1 width=8)
-> Seq Scan (cost=0.00 size=0 width=0)
-> Sort (cost=0.00 size=0 width=0)
-> Seq Scan on districts d
(cost=0.00 size=0 width=2)
-> Seq Scan (cost=0.00 size=0 width=0)
-> Sort (cost=0.00 size=0 width=0)
-> Seq Scan on shops sh (cost=0.00
size=0 width=6)
-> Seq Scan on central cn (cost=0.00 size=0 width=4)
-> Seq Scan on positions p (cost=0.00 size=0 width=4)

EXPLAIN

Oleg.
----
Oleg Broytmann http://members.xoom.com/phd2/ phd2(at)earthling(dot)net
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Broytmann 1999-02-24 15:47:11 Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-02-24 15:33:53 Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot