Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

From: Rich Teer <rich(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Date: 2007-02-23 20:08:03
Message-ID: Pine.SOL.4.64.0702231207020.29440@marrakesh (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-patches
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Zdenek Kotala wrote:

> There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any comments.

Very minor grammatical nits aside, it looks fine to me.
Thanks for updating the FAQ!

Cheers,

-- 
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member

President,
Rite Online Inc.

Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich

Attachment: FAQ.patch
Description: text/x-patch (3.1 KB)

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Axel NoltemeierDate: 2007-02-23 22:04:18
Subject: BUG #3067: Unnecessary lock blocks reindex
Previous:From: Dmitry KoterovDate: 2007-02-23 19:59:00
Subject: Re: BUG #3048: pg_dump dumps intarray metadata incorrectly

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-02-23 21:36:19
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BLCKSZ fun facts
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-02-23 19:56:29
Subject: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group