On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Seems to me the overhead of any such scheme would swamp the savings from
> avoiding kernel/userspace copies ...
Well, one really can't know without testing, but memory copies are
extremely expensive if they go outside of the cache.
> the locking issues alone would be painful.
I don't see why they would be any more painful than the current locking
issues. In fact, I don't see any reason to add more locking than we
already use when updating pages.
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.NetBSD.org
Make up enjoying your city life...produced by BIC CAMERA
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-10-24 14:39:35|
|Subject: Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some |
|Previous:||From: Max Baker||Date: 2004-10-24 05:08:11|
|Subject: Re: Vacuum takes a really long time, vacuum full required|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dennis Bjorklund||Date: 2004-10-24 06:45:54|
|Subject: Re: Proposed TODO: CREATE .... WITH OWNER; |
|Previous:||From: Lamar Owen||Date: 2004-10-24 03:21:12|
|Subject: Re: Time off|