On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Eric D Nielsen wrote:

> I see how that is what the spec says, but aren't the majority of joins that
> people use/want to update a join of some type?  I thought that SQL99 allowed
> updating view created by joins.
>
> In either case is this a place where "exceeding" the spec would be a good
> thing or a bad thing?

This is a case where exceeding the spec would be a very good thing.
And there has been lots of research on how to make more complex views
updatable; see Date's _Introduction to Database Systems, 7th Edition_
for an in-depth discussion of this.

That said, one step at a time is always good, and even having just the
very simplest views updatable would be a very nice thing.

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson  <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.netbsd.org
    Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light.  --XTC

In response to

• Re: Updateable views... at 2003-03-05 15:39:02 from Eric D Nielsen

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Greg Stark	Date: 2003-03-05 17:00:10
	Subject: Re: Updateable views...
Previous:	From: Rod Taylor	Date: 2003-03-05 16:12:01
	Subject: Re: Updateable views...