Re: WAL file location

From: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL file location
Date: 2002-07-31 00:09:28
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.4.44.0207310908280.454-100000@angelic.cynic.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> But the zeroth-order issue is not security. It is storage management for
> large databases. Any scheme we have for accomplishing that must hold up
> to scrutiny, but we can not refuse to proceed just because there are
> "lions tigers and bears" out there.

Well, I'm not sure how using a config file rather than environment
variables is stopping us from proceeding....

cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-31 00:40:13 getpid() function
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-07-31 00:00:07 Re: WAL file location