Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql?

From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden(at)zembu(dot)com>
To: Joe Brenner <doom(at)kzsu(dot)stanford(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql?
Date: 2001-07-03 18:16:21
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.4.21.0107031111590.358-100000@candlekeep.home-net.internetconnect.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Joe Brenner wrote:

> The reason I'm asking is that the place that I work is
> actually contemplating reverting from Oracle's expensive
> bugs to MySQL's (supposedly) cheap ones. They'd consider
> postgresql, but they figure that with MySQL they can at
> least point to sites that pump a fair amount of data with it
> (e.g. mp3.com).
>
> Please help save me from a life without referential
> integrity...

sourceforge for one. They were using MySQL, then changed. Also, look at
the postgres web site - there is an article there were someome did a speed
comparison between PG & MySQL. Postgres came out on top, even in places
where folks thought MySQL would win.

Also, it depends on what your application is. If there is any amount of DB
updates, PG will easily be the best choice. :-)

Take care,

Bill

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Naomi Walker 2001-07-03 18:16:28 Re: [OT] Any major users of postgresql?
Previous Message Alex Pilosov 2001-07-03 18:00:41 Re: selecting from cursor