Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: NetBSD/Alpha and PostgreSQL-current [was Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch]

From: "Thomas T(dot) Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>, Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>, Arrigo Triulzi <arrigo(at)albourne(dot)com>
Subject: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and PostgreSQL-current [was Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch]
Date: 2000-12-31 01:57:59
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.4.21.0012301957530.19799-100000@ns01.minnesota.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-general
i concure with this.

On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 20:10:58 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: Thomas T. Thai <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com>
> Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>,
>      Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>,
>      Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>,
>      Arrigo Triulzi <arrigo(at)albourne(dot)com>
> Subject: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and PostgreSQL-current [was Re: NetBSD/Alpha
>     and rkirkpat's patch] 
> 
> "Thomas T. Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com> writes:
> > psql: connectDBStart() -- connect() failed: No such file or directory
> >         Is the postmaster running locally
> >         and accepting connections on Unix socket '/tmp/.s.PGSQL.0'?
> 
> Hmm, do you have an environment definition for PGPORT?
> 
> I notice that pg_regress.sh contains
> 
> 	export PGPORT
> 
> but it doesn't necessarily set any value for PGPORT.  It seems possible
> that some shells may take this as license to invent an empty-string
> value for PGPORT, which would cause libpq to think that port 0 is being
> specified.
> 
> My feeling is that libpq ought to ignore an empty-string PGPORT
> environment value, rather than treat it as selecting port 0.
> Comments anyone?
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 


In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2000-12-31 03:23:33
Subject: Re: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and PostgreSQL-current [was Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch]
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-31 01:10:58
Subject: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and PostgreSQL-current [was Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch]

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-31 03:14:44
Subject: Re: How do we use classes as types?
Previous:From: Tim KientzleDate: 2000-12-31 01:11:26
Subject: Re: Failed Statements within Transactions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group