Re: [HACKERS] multi-byte aware char_length() etc.

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] multi-byte aware char_length() etc.
Date: 1998-04-27 17:07:17
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.3.95.980427130655.22570Q-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Applied...can you check that I haven't missed anything?

On Thu, 23 Apr 1998 t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp wrote:

> Hi, here are patches I promised (against 6.3.2):
>
> * character_length(), position(), substring() are now aware of
> multi-byte characters
> * add octet_length()
> * add --with-mb option to configure
> * new regression tests for EUC_KR
> (contributed by "Soonmyung. Hong" <hong(at)lunaris(dot)hanmesoft(dot)co(dot)kr>)
> * add some test cases to the EUC_JP regression test
> * fix problem in regress/regress.sh in case of System V
> * fix toupper(), tolower() to handle 8bit chars
>
> note that:
>
> o patches for both configure.in and configure are
> included. maybe the one for configure is not necessary.
>
> o pg_proc.h was modified to add octet_length(). I used OIDs
> (1374-1379) for that. Please let me know if these numbers are not
> appropriate.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jackson, DeJuan 1998-04-27 17:34:53 RE: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Practical SQL Handbook - demo scrip t for postgreSQL
Previous Message Jackson, DeJuan 1998-04-27 16:59:09 RE: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] Bug or Short between my brain and t he keyboard?