Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] patches now that 6.3 has been released

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] patches now that 6.3 has been released
Date: 1998-03-03 13:27:41
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.3.95.980303082522.13106G-100000@hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:

> What the procedure now? Is there a need to provide patches for 6.3, or is
> this only done for serious bug? That is new features go only into 6.4 as
> usual.

	Correct...v6.4 will be as different from v6.3, as v6.3 was from
v6.2.1...

> My last minor patch (allowing exec sql vacuum) didn't make it into cvs it
> seems. Should this be updated in 6.3 or should I just resubmit with changes
> for 6.4?

	Over time, it gets slightly harder, but if you can, make it a
seperate patch that we can add to the ftp server itself and that ppl can
download. (and, of course, add it in for v6.4 *grin*)




In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 1998-03-03 13:31:01
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] patches now that 6.3 has been released
Previous:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-03-03 13:24:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL - the Linux of Databases...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group