On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, David Owen wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, David Owen wrote:
> I discovered that if I change the rule to only do the insert, I still have
> troubles. The first update to simple2 will insert an row, but a second
> update will give a duplicate primary key error.
Sorry, that's a bad path (it's late). After the first update, there are
now two rows in simple1. The second update applys to both, so attempts to
create two new rows having the same timestamp. Ah well.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Sim Zacks||Date: 2008-01-30 06:18:06|
|Subject: Re: PGCon vs Postgresql Conference|
|Previous:||From: David Owen||Date: 2008-01-30 05:18:16|
|Subject: Re: Only first statement of two in update-rule is executing?|