Re: dell versus hp

From: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dell versus hp
Date: 2007-11-15 02:19:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0711141815050.30192@discord.home.frostconsultingllc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> On Nov 14, 2007 5:24 PM, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Ok, Areca ARC1261ML. Note that results were similar for an 8 drive RAID6
>>> vs 8 drive RAID10, but I don't have those bonnie results any longer.
>>>
>>> Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
>>> --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
>>> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
>>> /sec %CP 14xRAID6 63G 73967 99 455162 58 164543 23 77637 99
>>> 438570 31 912.2 1 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
>>> Create-------- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
>>> -Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
>>> %CP 16 12815 63 +++++ +++ 13041 61 12846 67 +++++ +++ 12871 59
>>>
>>>
>>> Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
>>> --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
>>> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
>>> /sec %CP 14xRAID10 63G 63968 92 246143 68 140634 30 77722 99
>>> 510904 36 607.8 0 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
>>> Create-------- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
>>> -Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
>>> %CP 16 6655 16 +++++ +++ 5755 12 7259 17 +++++ +++ 5550 12
>>
>> OK, impressive RAID-6 performance (not so impressive RAID-10 performance,
>> but that could be a filesystem issue). Note to self; try an Areca
>> controller in next storage server.
>
> 607 seeks/sec on a 8 drive raid 10 is terrible...this is not as
> dependant on filesystem as sequential performance...

Then this must be horrible since it's a 14 drive raid 10. :-/ If we had more
time for the testing, I would have tried a bunch of RAID1 volumes and
used software RAID0 to add the +0 bit and see how that performed.

Merlin, what sort of seeks/sec from bonnie++ do you normally see from your
RAID10 volumes?

On an 8xRAID10 volume with the smaller Areca controller we were seeing around
450 seeks/sec.

--
Jeff Frost, Owner <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2007-11-15 03:02:49 Re: Curious about dead rows.
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2007-11-15 01:56:32 Re: dell versus hp