Re: SCSI vs SATA

From: david(at)lang(dot)hm
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: 2007-04-06 22:04:08
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0704061503230.17492@asgard.lang.hm
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> Based on experience I think that on average server drives are more
> reliable than consumer grade drives, and can take more punishment.

this I am not sure about

> But,
> the variables of manufacturer, model, and the batch often make even more
> difference than grade.

this I will agree with fully.

David Lang

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Sprickman 2007-04-06 22:40:33 Re: SCSI vs SATA
Previous Message Alex Deucher 2007-04-06 21:48:28 Re: postgres 8.2 seems to prefer Seq Scan