Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?

From: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?
Date: 2006-05-15 18:52:41
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0605151151560.9581@discord.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-hackers
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Tom Lane wrote:

>> That's what I thought, but that doesn't seem to be what I'm observing.  Of
>> course the NAS device only gets wedged about once every month or two, so it's
>> difficult to reproduce.
>
> If it's really a PG bug, it should be trivial to reproduce: put a long
> sleep in the archive-command script.

Thanks Tom.  I'll try and reproduce on one of the other PG servers I have 
available when I have a chance and get back to you if it looks like a possible 
bug.


-- 
Jeff Frost, Owner 	<jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Frost Consulting, LLC 	http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908	FAX: 650-649-1954

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-05-15 19:17:18
Subject: Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-05-15 18:33:43
Subject: Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-05-15 19:35:18
Subject: Re: Synchronized Replication
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-05-15 18:33:43
Subject: Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group