Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file

From: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
Date: 2006-04-15 18:49:09
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0604151147350.9581@discord.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patches
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> And I tried it on Fedora Core 2:
>
> 	Device: 11h/17d Inode: 24707338    Links: 1
> 	Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--)  Uid: ( 7078/bmomjian)   Gid: (  100/   users)
> 	Access: 2006-04-15 11:41:53.000000000 -0700
> 	Modify: 2006-04-15 11:41:53.000000000 -0700
> 	Change: 2006-04-15 11:41:53.000000000 -0700

And you know what?  I pulled a bonehead maneuver when I read the output of my 
stat command.  FC3/4 appear to be the same.  I wonder if this is filesystem 
dependent since stat has all those trailing 0's for some reason.  Maybe we are 
back to using sort to decide the winner of a tie?

-- 
Jeff Frost, Owner 	<jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Frost Consulting, LLC 	http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908	FAX: 650-649-1954

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-04-15 18:50:05
Subject: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-04-15 18:42:31
Subject: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-04-15 18:50:05
Subject: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-04-15 18:42:31
Subject: Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group