| From: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | SF Postgres <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: order of performance |
| Date: | 2005-10-06 02:48:15 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.63.0510051947310.14401@discord.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | sfpug |
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, David Fetter wrote:
> It depends on which performance metric you're looking at. "Crashes per
> hour," for example, would get you a different answer from "number of
> disk writes per second."
Not surprisingly I was looking for the best performance running an OLTP
bechmark type metric...but crashes per hour is probably interesting as well.
;-)
>
>> Linux (particular distros?)
>> FreeBSD
>> Solarisx86
>> Windows
>
> Cheers,
> D
>
--
Jeff Frost, Owner <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-10-06 02:48:59 | Re: order of performance |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2005-10-06 02:43:46 | Re: order of performance |