On Mon, 9 May 2005 RBuchholz(at)Chamberlain(dot)com wrote:
> In the downloads section for pgadmin3 (v1.2.0), I see binary versions for
> RH9 and Fedora Cores 1 and 3, but no RHEL3.0 version.
> I scanned the userslist archive and saw that the recommendations were to
> use the RH9 binaries and not the RH Fedora Core versions for RHEL sites.
> In a thread from 28-Dec-2004, Devrim made mention that he could maybe do
> a build for RHEL3.0 binaries in Jan, but did not have all of the libraries
> Q1: Is a RHEL3.0 build still being considered?
Yes, I now have a box that I can build RHEL3 RPMs.
> Q2: Has there been any feedback from those on RHEL3.0 systems as to the
> functionality of the RH9 version, i.e., is this working out ok?
I'd try rebuilding the SRPM... It will work.
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
In response to
pgadmin-support by date
|Next:||From: Gino Lucrezi||Date: 2005-05-10 11:17:09|
|Subject: pgAdmin 1.2.1 doesn't display comments on constraints|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2005-05-09 21:47:30|
|Subject: Re: Privilege info is missing|