Re: cvsup binaries?

From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cvsup binaries?
Date: 2005-03-12 14:28:36
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.61.0503121627400.22890@emo.org.tr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Joe Conway wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>> The PostgreSQL docs suggest that ftp.postgresql.org holds binary builds of
>>> CVSup:
>>> Is this still the case? (I couldn't see any cvsup binaries, but perhaps
>>> they are well-hidden).
>>
>>
>> If they are still there, they're probably exceedingly out of date :-(
>
> Although listed as RH9, the ones at http://www.joeconway.com/ work on my FC2
> machine. They don't work on FC3 however, and I haven't gotten around to
> trying to rebuild on FC3.

If anyone's interested, I've rebuilt the packages for RHEL ES 3:

http://www.gunduz.org/rpms/cvsup/

Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCMvyWtl86P3SPfQ4RAl+9AKDJ6kL21t+f+Kehz8CVGcdrQokLwACfaB2r
ShLh063uyOHiuY35wpTIBG4=
=OzRi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolai Tufar 2005-03-12 15:00:14 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-03-12 14:01:48 Re: cvsup binaries?