Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg

From: "Brandon Metcalf" <bmetcalf(at)nortel(dot)com>
To: Vlad <marchenko(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Stanaway <david(at)stanaway(dot)net>,dbdpg-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg
Date: 2005-04-08 19:10:33
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58L.0504081408060.18466@cash.rhiamet.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
m == marchenko(at)gmail(dot)com writes:

 m> it's acceptible (actually better in form of passing columns type via
 m> bind_values) as a quick workaround for a small scripts only. Actually
 m> as a quick workarround it's easier to downgrade DBD::Pg.

 m> Think of numerouse DB-OO Mappers and Object Persistance tools... it
 m> won't be easy to fix all of them. As of right now a lot of times you
 m> get screwed if you upgrade DBD::Pg to 1.40-1.41.

When you say downgrade DBD::Pg, is there a version that doesn't have
this problem?  That is, the problem of everything being treated as
SQL_VARCHAR?


-- 
Brandon

In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-08 19:11:49
Subject: Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg
Previous:From: VladDate: 2005-04-08 19:07:04
Subject: Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group