On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > I ran across this yesterday on HEAD:
> > template1=# grant select on foo, foo to swm;
> > ERROR: tuple already updated by self
> Seems to fail similarly in every version back to 7.2; probably further,
> but that's all I have running at the moment.
> > We could do away with the error by producing a unique list of object names
> > -- but that would impose an extra cost on the common case.
> CommandCounterIncrement in the GRANT loop would be easier, likely.
> I'm having a hard time getting excited about it though...
Yeah, its not that exciting but that error message would throw your
I've attached a patch which calls CommandCounterIncrement() in each of the
Description: text/plain (1.4 KB)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2005-07-28 06:21:13|
|Subject: Re: VACUUM DATABASE|
|Previous:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2005-07-28 05:12:49|
|Subject: Re: Some new list.c primitives|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-07-28 06:34:59|
|Subject: Re: PLPGSQL OID Bug |
|Previous:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2005-07-28 05:51:45|
|Subject: Re: PLPGSQL OID Bug|