Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.0.0beta1 small inconsistency in pg_aggregate listing

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.0.0beta1 small inconsistency in pg_aggregate listing
Date: 2004-08-20 15:56:53
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0408201747140.31684@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
> > Maybe something wrong with the regproc type?
>
> regprocout doesn't schema-qualify if the function name is unique without
> it.

Ok. Maybe too clever, as I couldn't guess by looking at it.

> Of course, the function name isn't necessarily unique *with* it, either,
> but regproc can't do anything about that.  Cast to regprocedure if you
> want to see a more helpful display of the function.

Much better indeed.

Thanks a lot for the light. Have a nice day.

-- 
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: PostgreSQL Bugs ListDate: 2004-08-20 21:02:53
Subject: BUG #1226: pgAdminIII crashes after closing server status window
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-20 15:44:28
Subject: Re: 8.0.0beta1 small inconsistency in pg_aggregate listing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group