Re: BUG #1222: database owner should have implicit control

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, radim kolar <hsn(at)netmag(dot)cz>, PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #1222: database owner should have implicit control
Date: 2004-08-18 12:57:50
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0408181456530.31684@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


> > > Database owner should have implicit control over public schema
> >
> > There has been some discussion of causing the public schema to be owned
> > by the DB owner, but this has not happened yet, partly because we are
> > not sure of all the consequences.
>
> was just looking at this this morning. is there anyway to change
> ownership of a schema? i couldn't find one and thought i'd ask before
> whacking on the system tables.

"ALTER SCHEMA foo OWNER TO bla" if you're a super user.

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PostgreSQL Bugs List 2004-08-18 14:14:56 BUG #1223: RedHat Linux 8
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-08-18 12:29:43 Re: BUG #1222: database owner should have implicit control