| From: | "David F(dot) Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T |
| Date: | 2004-07-21 14:59:28 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0407211056450.8830@shishi.roaringpenguin.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> pg_dump -t s1.t1 -t s2.t2 -- Dump s1.t1 and s2.t2
That's a good idea, but then it's questionable whether we need the -n
switch at all. It might be simpler to extend the -t switch to
accept:
pg-dump -t 's1.*'
rather than using a -n switch. Of course, that breaks
backward-compatibility.
Regards,
David.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-21 15:09:17 | Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-21 14:53:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-21 15:09:17 | Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-21 14:53:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |