> > So maybe the following TODO could be kept:
> > - validate grant/revoke (error, warning, success0 wrt sql standard
> > I may be interested in implementing ROLEs someday, and such tests would be
> > welcome just to check that nothing is broken.
> Unless someone can say it is wrong I am not inclinded to add a TODO item
> that is only possible.
Sorry, I do not understand your argument, what you mean by "only
possible". Or are you talking about roles??
I see TODO items as wishes, and I'm not sure I can see what is wrong with
wishing better/full testing of postgresql data access controls and compare
the results with what is defined by the norm?
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2004-06-10 12:09:58|
|Subject: Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures|
|Previous:||From: Martino Serri||Date: 2004-06-10 08:06:44|
|Subject: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this platform|