| From: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hans-Jrgen_Schnig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tablespaces |
| Date: | 2004-02-26 11:58:25 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0402262255140.17527@linuxworld.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> Is it possible to put WALs and CLOGs into different tablespaces? (maybe
> different RAID systems). Some companies want that ...
I wasn't going to look at that just yet.
There is of course the temporary hack of symlinking WAL else where.
I'd be interested to see the performance difference between WAL and data
on the same RAID/controller and WAL and data on different RAID/controller
with Jan's improvements to the buffer management.
Gavin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2004-02-26 12:12:41 | Re: Tablespaces |
| Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2004-02-26 11:25:24 | Re: Tablespaces |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2004-02-26 12:12:41 | Re: Tablespaces |
| Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2004-02-26 11:25:24 | Re: Tablespaces |