Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?
Date: 2003-08-19 08:18:19
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.56.0308191017140.4847@krusty.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> Now that we are in beta, does someone want to tackle a "security"
> section in the docs?

IMO, security shouldn't be a section, it should be a recurring theme
throughout all documentation material.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Dan LangilleDate: 2003-08-19 10:08:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-08-19 08:16:25
Subject: Re: Inconsistencies in our SGML output

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dan LangilleDate: 2003-08-19 10:08:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-08-19 07:51:51
Subject: Re: set constraints docs page

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group