| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions? |
| Date: | 2003-07-31 09:02:01 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.56.0307311024460.1729@krusty.credativ.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> If we change default_transaction_read_only to PGC_USERLIMIT, the
> administrator can turn it on and off, but an ordinary user can only turn
> it on, but not off.
> Would that help?
No, it would break the SQL standard.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rory Campbell-Lange | 2003-07-31 11:56:51 | Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-07-31 09:01:57 | Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-07-31 10:38:23 | Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-07-31 09:01:57 | Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-07-31 09:36:09 | Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-07-31 09:01:57 | Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Why READ ONLY transactions? |