Re: Ugly group by problem

From: Achilleus Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>
To: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ugly group by problem
Date: 2006-03-30 10:20:23
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0603301317350.23284-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

O Markus Schaber έγραψε στις Mar 29, 2006 :

> Hi, Achilleus,
>
> Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
>
> > foodb=# SELECT qoo.foo2,sum(qoo.foo3) from (SELECT mt.link_id as
> > foo,_int_union(array(select mt2.feat_id from markustest mt2 where
> > mt2.link_id=mt.link_id order by mt2.feat_id),'{}') as foo2,other::int4 as
> > foo3 from markustest mt) as qoo GROUP BY qoo.foo2;
> > foo2 | sum
> > --------+-----
> > {2} | 1
> > {5,23} | 13
> > {23} | 14
> > (3 rows)
>
> This is much like I intended to do it, but using "select distinct" in
> the inner select as I don't have _int_union here, and using a temporary
> table to collect the sets of link ids.

Just some facts:

sort(uniq(int[])) has the same effect as select DISTINCT... ORDER BY
DISTINCT. ORDER BY is ofcourse more intuitive and does not need
contrib/intarray.

In fact , i dont even remember why i didnt write the query with
DISTINCT... in the first place :)

>
> Markus
>
>
>

--
-Achilleus

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eugene E. 2006-03-31 06:17:00 Re: have you feel anything when you read this ?
Previous Message Achilleus Mantzios 2006-03-30 08:46:44 Re: [SQL] Flight numbers data