Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug

From: "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug
Date: 2006-02-15 23:35:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0602142349120.7688-100000@lnfm1.sai.msu.ru (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Sergey E. Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru> writes:
> > The problem with that is in fact in pl_exec.c in function
> > compatible_tupdesc(), which do not check for the deleted attributes.
> 
> Is that really the only problem?

Tom, 

Are there any problems with that patch to not be applied ? 
(Sorry if I'm hurrying)

Regards,
	Sergey

*****************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy
Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math 
E-mail: math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru





In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-15 23:40:22
Subject: Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-15 23:28:29
Subject: qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index behaviour)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-15 23:40:22
Subject: Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-15 20:23:38
Subject: Re: BUG #2246: Only call pg_fe_getauthname if none given

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group