Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug

From: "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug
Date: 2006-02-12 17:34:26
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0602122030260.15708-100000@lnfm1.sai.msu.ru (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Sergey E. Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru> writes:
> > The problem with that is in fact in pl_exec.c in function
> > compatible_tupdesc(), which do not check for the deleted attributes.
> 
> Is that really the only problem?

I cannot be completely sure in that, but at least the submitted patch 
eliminate the problem with the SQL code from my previous email.  

Regards, 
	Sergey

*****************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy
Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math 
E-mail: math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru




In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2006-02-12 18:33:30
Subject: Re: User Defined Types in Java
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-12 17:28:43
Subject: Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-02-12 19:13:51
Subject: ALTER CONSTRAINT RENAME patch reverted
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-12 17:28:43
Subject: Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group