Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger

From: Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>
To: Denis Lussier <denis(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu, <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,<neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger
Date: 2005-06-28 22:53:15
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0506290036140.9650-100000@kix.fsv.cvut.cz (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> There's going to be a painful period later this year when Mysqueel 
is able to claim that their production db has more ansi compatability 
than PG (at least for triggers and stored procs).

MySQL5 is really comparable with Pg8, but Firebird2 or SQLlite3 too. But 
from my perspective procedural language isn't essentials. Possiblity run 
perl or python prucedures is important. Today is first day of discussion 
and there is half of year space for developing. 

> 
> It'll be very kewl having native PG with a fully ansi-iso compliant 
stored procedure language with an efficient and clean implementation 
with great performance charateristics and a debugger to boot...
> 

Who not?



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-06-28 23:30:53
Subject: Re: Role syntax (or, SQL99 versus sanity)
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2005-06-28 22:33:56
Subject: Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group