Re: lastval()

From: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: lastval()
Date: 2005-06-05 05:49:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0506050744150.7072-100000@zigo.dhs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Neil Conway wrote:

> > Here is a small patch that implements a function lastval() that
>
> Have you had a chance to respin this patch per my earlier comments on
> the implementation, Dennis?

I've been spending my free time on another project and I don't multitask
very well :-)

Anyway, let me take a look at it in a minute. My main comment is that it's
not the code that's the main thing to fix but to decide is if we want the
feature at all.

--
/Dennis Björklund

In response to

Responses

  • Re: lastval() at 2005-06-05 12:01:31 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Bjorklund 2005-06-05 06:00:04 Re: lastval()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-05 04:51:43 Re: pgsql: Fix NUMERIC modulus to properly truncate

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Bjorklund 2005-06-05 06:00:04 Re: lastval()
Previous Message John Hansen 2005-06-05 04:51:36 Re: Unicode characters above 0x10000 #2