Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql-server/src/test/regress sql/union.sql ex ...

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/src/test/regress sql/union.sql ex ...
Date: 2003-11-04 19:47:41
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311042046430.31974-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Tom Lane writes:

> Our alternatives would be to add enough ORDER BY clauses to constrain
> the results (which I don't want to do because it would limit the set
> of join plans testable by the tests), or to add another result file
> for this test.  I'd be in favor of the latter if there were more than
> one platform showing this behavior, or if I thought that UnixWare's
> behavior wouldn't change again next time SCO decides to tweak qsort.

Fair enough.  I just thought, reading your commit message, that you had
set out to completely fix it.  I say we leave it as is for now.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-04 20:54:13
Subject: pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml release.sgml
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-11-04 19:25:56
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/src/test/regress sql/union.sql ex ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group