Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Embedded SQL: Putting a guard around included

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net>
Cc: carstenklein(at)yahoo(dot)de, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,<pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Embedded SQL: Putting a guard around included
Date: 2003-10-08 18:23:29
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0310082022460.26413-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
Peter Galbavy writes:

> Does POSIX say anything about multiple inclusion of this and others ?

"Except that the effect of each inclusion of <assert.h> depends on the
definition of NDEBUG, headers may be included in any order, and each may
be included more than once in a given scope, with no difference in effect
from that of being included only once."

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Igor ShevchenkoDate: 2003-10-11 09:20:25
Subject: libpq/async notifications
Previous:From: Peter GalbavyDate: 2003-10-08 10:27:04
Subject: Re: Embedded SQL: Putting a guard around included stdio.h for convenience

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group