Re: Disabling function validation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Disabling function validation
Date: 2003-10-07 16:39:43
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0310071838130.21517-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> I think we should change the "check_function_bodies" to something more
> general. I like "restore_validation_mode" because it could also be used
> to disable foreign key checks which we are discussing. An even more
> general idea would be to have something like "restore_mode", and perhaps
> could handle cases like allowing a larger sort_mem or other
> optimizations during restore.

I also like this approach (independent of whether foreign keys should be
one of its applications). It gives us more freedom to open and close
these types of holes when new issues arise or pg_dump improves.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-07 16:58:24 Re: Disabling function validation
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL 2003-10-07 08:07:56 pgsql-server/src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib da ...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-10-07 16:57:20 BigInt woes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-07 15:58:26 Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3