Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...
Date: 2003-10-04 23:01:35
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0310050057150.2745-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> > If it's only honored by SQL functions, then it should probably be called
> > check_sql_function_bodies.
>
> I thought about that while I was making the patch, but decided that it
> would be a very un-forward-looking name.  Someday we will probably have
> syntax-checking validators for plpgsql, etc.

The point of this feature is to avoid failures because of forward
references in SQL code.  A syntax-checking validator in anything but
possibly plpgsql will not even look at SQL code, so a validator for
a different language will only gain pain and confusion by respecting this
parameter.  Perhaps it needs to different name altogether, along the lines
of "do not check SQL code in functions".

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-10-04 23:15:15
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2003-10-04 22:00:13
Subject: Re: max_connections/shared_buffers (was Re: Beta4 Tag'd

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-10-04 23:04:18
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml rc/interf ...
Previous:From: Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQLDate: 2003-10-04 22:50:20
Subject: pgsql-server/src/backend/po es.po

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group