Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...
Date: 2003-10-04 23:01:35
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0310050057150.2745-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> > If it's only honored by SQL functions, then it should probably be called
> > check_sql_function_bodies.
>
> I thought about that while I was making the patch, but decided that it
> would be a very un-forward-looking name. Someday we will probably have
> syntax-checking validators for plpgsql, etc.

The point of this feature is to avoid failures because of forward
references in SQL code. A syntax-checking validator in anything but
possibly plpgsql will not even look at SQL code, so a validator for
a different language will only gain pain and confusion by respecting this
parameter. Perhaps it needs to different name altogether, along the lines
of "do not check SQL code in functions".

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-10-04 23:04:18 Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml rc/interf ...
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL 2003-10-04 22:50:20 pgsql-server/src/backend/po es.po

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-10-04 23:15:15 Re: [HACKERS] initdb
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-10-04 22:00:13 Re: max_connections/shared_buffers (was Re: Beta4 Tag'd