Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: initdb

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: initdb
Date: 2003-10-01 20:54:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0310012250590.2932-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan writes:

> So if the data directory previously existed and was empty, we don't
> clean it out on error, even if we didn't use the noclean flag. Is this
> intended behaviour or a bug? (If a bug it's trivially easy to fix.)

If the data directory already existed, we don't want to delete it.  We
should possibly delete the content, though.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

  • initdb at 2003-10-01 20:03:44 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-10-01 21:10:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb
Previous:From: scott.marloweDate: 2003-10-01 20:29:43
Subject: Re: Lost mails

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-10-01 21:10:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-10-01 20:03:44
Subject: initdb

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group