Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?

From: Michael Pohl <pgsql(at)newtopia(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Date: 2003-09-15 16:05:24
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0309151154220.10153-100000@server1.techplant.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Alexey Borzov wrote:

> Michael Pohl wrote:
> 
> > As a side note, I appreciate the PgSQL community's apparent commitment to
> > avoid both FUD and overstatement of PgSQL's capabilities.
> 
> If you look closely at my list, it has no overstatements. It has no 
> false statements either, everything can be backed up by appropriate links.

I did not mean to imply that your list contained overstatements.  I was
making a general statement about the tone I've noticed on the PgSQL
mailing lists and web site, vs. what I've noticed in other projects.  I
apologize for not being clear.

michael


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-09-15 16:39:19
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Previous:From: Alexey BorzovDate: 2003-09-15 14:42:47
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group