Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FE/BE Protocol 3.0 Draft - Some Comments

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: ljb <lbayuk(at)mindspring(dot)com>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FE/BE Protocol 3.0 Draft - Some Comments
Date: 2003-04-23 14:23:15
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0304231107520.1676-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
Tom Lane writes:

> Agreed, it's much richer than it was before, but I disagree with your
> opinion that empty complexity is being added.  There are good examples
> in the existing error message repertoire for each of the concepts I
> propose adding.  For instance, here are two examples of existing
> messages that are offering hints:

Message + hint is OK, but can you give an example of a "detail"?
(Better more than one.)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

Responses

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-04-23 15:26:26
Subject: Re: FE/BE Protocol 3.0 Draft - Some Comments
Previous:From: Lee KindnessDate: 2003-04-23 08:47:06
Subject: ECPG thread-safety

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group