Michael Graff writes:
> One other poster suggested they should be two data types, which I half
> agree with. There are advantages of being able to use IPv4 or IPv6
> addresses in the same column, so I wouldn't have to have two tables
> for host <-> address mappings, for instance. I'm undecided on which
> is better, but so far I've used the inet with ipv4 and 6 data type
> once and found them useful under one data type.
Perhaps we can make "inet" take both and then define domains "inet4" and
"inet6" over it that only take one kind.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net