Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:

> How about reindexdb?
> Do you think we should replace them all with a utility called pg_maintain
> that can do all of them?

If you ask me, we could get rid of them completely because

for d in $(psql -l --somthing); do vacuum $d; done

seems perfectly fine.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

• Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... at 2003-03-19 01:33:22 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Responses

• Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... at 2003-03-20 16:22:01 from Bruce Momjian
• Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... at 2003-03-20 16:55:09 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2003-03-20 16:22:01
	Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2003-03-20 16:17:34
	Subject: Re: More outdated examples

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2003-03-20 16:22:01
	Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian - CVS	Date: 2003-03-20 16:17:32
	Subject: pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml typeconv.sgml