Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [INTERFACES] Upgrading the backend's error-message infrastructure

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Upgrading the backend's error-message infrastructure
Date: 2003-03-18 14:35:38
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0303181520350.2003-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Tom Lane writes:

> Hmm.  I can't see any advantage to these over assigning our own codes;
> ours would have at least *some* mnemonic value, rather than being chosen
> completely at random ...

One advantage is that interfaces that are required to use these constants
would not need an internal translation table.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-03-18 14:36:03
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Upgrading the backend's error-message infrastructure
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-03-18 14:34:53
Subject: Re: XML ouput for psql

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-03-18 14:36:03
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Upgrading the backend's error-message infrastructure
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2003-03-18 03:40:18
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group