Re: :PgSQL: More Queestions

From: Rudy Lippan <rlippan(at)remotelinux(dot)com>
To: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>
Cc: David Wheeler <david(at)wheeler(dot)net>, Jeff Urlwin <jurlwin(at)bellatlantic(dot)net>, <dbi-dev(at)perl(dot)org>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: :PgSQL: More Queestions
Date: 2002-11-20 16:17:46
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0211201047190.16983-100000@elfride.ineffable.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Tim Bunce wrote:

> > Maybe it's just too complex, because, looking at DBD::ODBC's
> > dbd_preparse(), the handling of literals in the query seems a good deal
> > more straight-forward (though it doesn't appear to handle '\'' or "\""
> > -- am I reading that right?
>
> ANSI standard doesn't use backslashes, it uses doubling: "...""..."
>

Postgres does, however ugly it may be. So this needs to be suported lest
a \" thow off placeholder counting and thus breaking execute(). But at
least pg supports geminate "s.

Later,

-r

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Urlwin 2002-11-20 16:36:58 Re: :PgSQL: More Queestions
Previous Message Peter Haworth 2002-11-20 15:56:46 Re: DBD::PostgreSQL