Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: indisclustered and clusterdb

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: indisclustered and clusterdb
Date: 2002-09-03 06:10:29
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0209030209500.2005-100000@cm-lcon1-46-187.cm.vtr.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane dijo: 

> BTW, clusterdb is not schema-aware and will surely fail in any database
> where more than one schema is in use, because it doesn't trouble to
> schema-qualify table names.

Doh.  I will look into it.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"El Maquinismo fue proscrito so pena de cosquilleo hasta la muerte"
(Ijon Tichy en Viajes, Stanislaw Lem)


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-09-03 06:41:50
Subject: findoidjoins
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-09-03 04:22:32
Subject: Re: dblink bug fix - please apply prior to wrapping up beta tarball

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group