Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bug in config for cygwin

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Scott <scott(dot)ellis(at)aetas(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in config for cygwin
Date: 2002-08-18 11:20:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0208181306030.1077-100000@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Scott writes:

> Yep I thought so - that's why I didn't think it's really a bug - but the
> include really ought to be after the define, and if it was I would be able
> to use the same headers for both cygwin and non-cygwin builds...would just
> be 'nice to have'.

Write to pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org to discuss your proposal.  Maybe it's
possible, but someone knowledgeable needs to check that it doesn't break
anything else.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2002-08-18 15:01:09
Subject: cube output function can overrun its buffer
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-08-18 01:31:20
Subject: Re: Bug #740: Temp tables not deleted if postmaster

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group